1. U.S. House
Passes National Tort Reform Bill
The U.S. House of Representative last week passed, by a
vote of 229 to 196, a national professional liability reform bill
(HR 5), which would cap noneconomic damage awards at $250,000. This
is very good news, even though HR 5 contains some provisions that
CMA does not support—including its application not only to
physicians and other health care providers, but to health plans and
pharmaceutical manufacturers. If a state has established (or
establishes in the future) its own liability limits, HR 5 defers to
state law. California already has a $250,000 cap on noneconomic
damages in medical malpractice, but does not cap such damages for
health plans and drug companies that lose liablilty
lawsuits.
Now that the House has
passed its version of a malpractice reform bill, it is essential
that the medical community convince the Senate to follow suit—but
with an even better version. CMA continues to encourage and support
California Senator Dianne Feinstein as she crafts her "pure MICRA"
bill, which will be modeled after California’s Medical Injury
Compensation Reform Act (MICRA).
Sen. Feinstein, still
lacking support from her fellow Senate Democrats, has yet to submit
her proposed Senate MICRA bill. CMA is asking California physicians
with colleagues in other states to urge those colleagues to visit
their Democratic Senators in person to urge their support for Sen.
Feinstein’s bill.
When CMA CEO Jack Lewin,
M.D., and CMA President Dr. John Whitelaw, M.D., spoke with Senate
Majority Leader Bill Frist in Washington D.C. last week, Sen. Frist
said that he would like a tort reform bill to be discussed on the
senate floor within two weeks. While the conflict in Iraq may delay
that schedule, CMA leaders have made it clear to Senate leadership
that CMA will not compromise on the $250,000 cap or other key MICRA
provisions.
Click here for more
information.
Contact: Rachel Doherty
Smith, 916/444-5532 or rsmith@cmanet.org.
BACK TO TOP
2. Courts
Uphold Noncontracting Physicians' Rights to Health Plan
Payment
Two recent Court of Appeal
decisions uphold physicians’ rights to recover payment from health
plans for medically necessary services, even if they do not have a
contract with the health plan or its contracting intermediary. In
Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. UHP Healthcare (2002) and
San Joaquin Community Hospital v. PacifiCare (2003), the courts concluded that where no contract
exists and where the patient assigns to the provider his or her
right to health plan reimbursement, noncontracting health care
providers have a right to seek reimbursement directly from the
health plan. The courts also ruled that the Knox-Keene Act does not
preclude lawsuits seeking reimbursement based on contract theory
and/or the Unfair Competition Law (Business & Professions Code
§17200).
For additional details on
these cases, click
here . The following CMA ON-CALL
documents have also been updated to reflect these decisions: #0130,
Noncontracting Physicians/Implied Contract; #0131, Insolvency of
IPA—Pre-Bankruptcy; and #0106, Bankruptcy or Insolvency of Plan.
ON-CALL documents are available free to CMA members at CMA's
members-only
website
. Nonmembers can purchase
ON-CALL documents for $2 per page at the
CMA Bookstore
.
Contact: CMA’s legal
information specialists, 415/882-5144 or legalinfo@cmanet.org.
BACK TO TOP
3. HIPAA Tip: FAQ About
OHCAs My hospital says I
am in its "OHCA." What does that mean? An OHCA, or organized health
care arrangement, is an administrative construct under HIPAA that
allows information sharing between a hospital and its medical staff,
between a health plan and its contracted providers, and between an
IPA and its contracted providers. According to the U.S. Office of
Civil Rights, members of an OHCA can share protected health
information (referred to as PHI) with other members of the OHCA on
matters of common concern (at least to the extent those members are
also covered by HIPAA), without a separate business-associate
agreement. An OHCA member can also share the protected information
with another member’s business associates. If you are on staff at
several hospitals, you will be a member of several OHCAs.
My hospital wants me to use Its "Notice of Privacy
Practices." Is this okay? Generally speaking, it will be a convenience
for you. In an OHCA, the hospital and medical staff members can have
a joint "notice of privacy practices" for all inpatients. In the
absence of such a joint notice, a physician who is covered by HIPAA
would have to give each new patient, or an existing patient who has
not yet received the physician’s notice, an individual notice of
privacy practices. This would not be very convenient. Hospitals are
not required to offer a joint notice, but many will do so. Please be
sure to review the hospital’s notice of privacy practices to be sure
it does not present any problems for you as it applies to your
hospital practice and records.
My hospital wants me to sign an agreement about my being
in the OHCA. Do I have to Sign it? Technically, no
agreement is required to establish an OHCA. By definition under
HIPAA, a hospital and its medical staff are an OHCA. But an
agreement is necessary if physicians wish to use the OHCA’s privacy
notice. CMA suggests that the medical staff officers review the
proposed agreement to make sure it benefits the entire medical
staff, and does not create unnecessary burdens for those physicians
who are not covered by HIPAA. Moreover, since issues concerning the
confidentiality of medical information are central to "the
professional work performed in the hospital," any such agreement
should be included in the medical staff rules and
regulations.
Click here for more HIPAA
information.
Contact: CMA’s HIPAA
Hotline, 415/882-3311 or legalinfo@cmanet.org.
BACK TO TOP
4. FDA Seeks Public Comment
on Ephedra Labeling
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently reopened
for public comment a proposed rule entitled "Dietary Supplements
Containing Ephedrine Alkaloids," which was originally published in
the Federal Register on June 4, 1997. The proposed rule would, among
other things, require a warning statement on the labels of products
containing ephedra. Since the 1997 proposal, new scientific evidence
has come to light concerning the health risks associated with the
use of ephedra. In response, the FDA is again seeking public comment
to help determine the appropriateness of labeling requirements and
other restrictions on ephedra-containing products.
The comments will help the
FDA determine whether the currently available evidence and medical
literature present dietary supplements containing ephedra as posing
a "significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury." This is
the standard that must be met under the Dietary Supplement Health
and Education Act for the government to take regulatory action on
ephedra.
CMA asks physicians to
submit comments—including details of their patients’ experiences
with ephedra—to Robin Flagg Strimling at
rstrimling@cmanet.org or
415/882-3390 (fax). Please return comments to Ms. Strimling by March
28 so that she can compile and present them to the FDA by the April
4 deadline.
The FDA has made several
publications available on dietary supplements containing ephedra,
including a new FDA white paper, a RAND study that reviewed 16,000
adverse event reports, and a Federal Register notice seeking public
comments. All of these documents can be found by
clicking
here .
Contact: Robin Flagg
Strimling, 415/882-5110 or rstrimling@cmanet.org.
BACK TO TOP
5. Southern California Medicare Claims Denied in
Error CMA has learned that Medicare
claims recently submitted by a large number of Southern California
physicians were mistakenly denied because of a computer error. NHIC,
California’s Medicare carrier, is aware of the problem and expects
to have all the affected claims adjusted by the end of the month.
Claims affected were those processed between March 3 and March 6,
with the denial code "PR49."
The claim (ICN) numbers on
the corrected claims will start with "48." Physicians who do not
agree with the determinations made on the corrected claims can
submit appeals by phone to NHIC’s telephone review line,
866/539-5597, or by mail to Medicare Appeals, P.O. Box 2854, Chico,
CA 95927-2854.
Contact: CMA’s
Reimbursement Help Line, 888/401-5597.
BACK TO TOP
6. CMA Convenes
132nd House of Delegates
Nearly 700 physicians
representing geographic communities, ethnicities, and specialties
from across the state will convene this weekend at the San Francisco
Hilton and Towers for CMA’s 132nd annual House of Delegates. From
March 22 to 25, delegates will be considering nearly 200
resolutions, including ones on reforming Medicare, covering the
uninsured, equalizing health care for minorities, and combating
childhood obesity.
Ronald Bangasser, M.D., of
Redlands will be inaugurated as CMA president, and Robert Hertzka,
M.D., of San Diego will take office as CMA’s
president-elect.
For more information,
including copies of resolutions,
click here .
Stay tuned to Alert over the next few weeks for
highlights from this year’s House of
Delegates.
BACK TO TOP
7. You're Invited to CMA's 2003
Legislative Leadership Day
CMA invites you to its 29th Annual Legislative Leadership
Day on Wednesday, April 30 in Sacramento. RSVP to your local medical
society/association or one of the 11 cosponsoring organizations by
April 14.
Click
here
for more
information.
Contact: CMA Government
Relations, 916/444-5532 or madorno@cmanet.org.
BACK TO TOP
8.
Save the
Dates
More information and
registration forms for these events are available online at
http://www.calphys.org.
Pri-Med West: CMA-sponsored Pri-Med
West will be held April 2 to 5 at the Long Beach Convention Center.
This year’s conference, "Current Clinical Issues in Primary Care,"
offers over 50 lectures and 40 industry-sponsored symposia.
Physicians can earn up to 28 CME credits. Registration is $40 for
CMA members (nonmembers $75).
Click here for registration
information.
Pri-Med Updates: CMA-sponsored Pri-Med
Updates (Formerly Pri-Med Symposia Series), a conference covering
the most frequently encountered clinical challenges facing primary
care physicians, will be held April 10, at the San Francisco Airport
Marriott. Topics to be covered are lipid management, digital imaging
for cardiovascular disease, sexual health, hypertension, allergic
rhinitis, urinary stress incontinence, and migraines. Earn up to
8.75 Category I CME credits. Registration is free, but space is
limited.
Click
here for registration
information.
IMQ’s CME Providers Conference: This
year’s CME Providers Conference, "Targeting Success: Strengthening
CME Programs by Incorporating Desired Results," will be May 2 at the
San Francisco Airport Marriott. Attendees will learn how to design
and strengthen a CME program, how to develop and present an annual
reappraisal of an overall CME program, and how to identify and
incorporate appropriate, organization-specific, desired results into
a hospital’s or other health care organization’s mission statement
and educational activities. In response to feedback from last year’s
conference, IMQ has added "Nuts and Bolts," a preconference seminar
that will cover, among other things, activity planning and the role
of the CME committee. CMA members receive a discounted rate of $295
(nonmembers $340). The "Nuts and Bolts" program costs an additional
$100.
Click
here for registration
information.
BACK TO TOP
For previous editions of CMA
Alert, visit our
news archives
.
Send
address changes to:
data@cmanet.org. Send unsubscribe requests to:data@cmanet.org.
Prepared by the CMA Communication
Center Katherine Gallia, Editor, 916/551-2074,
kgallia@cmanet.org Noel
Tatlonghari, Publishing Assistant, 415/882-3320, ntatlonghari@cmanet.org
|